<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MediaTemple vs. DreamHost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/</link>
	<description>Thoughts &#38; Articles on ASP.net, C#, Software Development and Technology by Yaakov Ellis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: creaserv</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-120646</link>
		<dc:creator>creaserv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-120646</guid>
		<description>I have been using dreamhost for years and have had very few issues. The best thing about them is their openness and honesty. When they have a problem, they report it to you immediately. That is UNHEARD OF!!!

However, their servers have always been relatively slow. So, my policy has always been to get high traffic sites their own server plan and then just host fun low traffic sites on dreamhost.

A few months ago I setup a media temple account. For regular, database driven sites, it seems to be uber fast and has blown my mind. Some open source apps run super super slow on their setup, but for the most part speed is what&#039;s great about them.

I read this article as I am trying to decide which account to cancel and which to move forward with.

Even though Dreamhost is about half the price and provides more than 4 times the storage of media temple, I am pretty confident that I am going to be moving all of my sites off of dreamhost and making the fulltime move to media temple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using dreamhost for years and have had very few issues. The best thing about them is their openness and honesty. When they have a problem, they report it to you immediately. That is UNHEARD OF!!!</p>
<p>However, their servers have always been relatively slow. So, my policy has always been to get high traffic sites their own server plan and then just host fun low traffic sites on dreamhost.</p>
<p>A few months ago I setup a media temple account. For regular, database driven sites, it seems to be uber fast and has blown my mind. Some open source apps run super super slow on their setup, but for the most part speed is what&#8217;s great about them.</p>
<p>I read this article as I am trying to decide which account to cancel and which to move forward with.</p>
<p>Even though Dreamhost is about half the price and provides more than 4 times the storage of media temple, I am pretty confident that I am going to be moving all of my sites off of dreamhost and making the fulltime move to media temple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightmarehost</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-72703</link>
		<dc:creator>nightmarehost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-72703</guid>
		<description>For the love of GOD, do NOT go with nightmare host! You&#039;re better off hosting a site on your own cable modem! (not kidding).

Media Temple by far has the better service. Sure they might have a few bugs here and there... but when it comes to scalability and performance, they give you what you paid for and then some. 

On nightmare host if you have any type of high traffic spike or high bandwidth server, you get SHUT DOWN. Then the support will tell you how you&#039;re disrupting everyone else they packed into a shared server... They offer you all that bandwidth but will never allow you to come close to using it.

And when they put you back online (days later), and you get a ton of legit traffic to your website... BAM shutdown forever. No refund. They steal your source code and wont give it back. You ask them to delete it, they wont.

Nightmarehost = thieves and cheats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the love of GOD, do NOT go with nightmare host! You&#8217;re better off hosting a site on your own cable modem! (not kidding).</p>
<p>Media Temple by far has the better service. Sure they might have a few bugs here and there&#8230; but when it comes to scalability and performance, they give you what you paid for and then some. </p>
<p>On nightmare host if you have any type of high traffic spike or high bandwidth server, you get SHUT DOWN. Then the support will tell you how you&#8217;re disrupting everyone else they packed into a shared server&#8230; They offer you all that bandwidth but will never allow you to come close to using it.</p>
<p>And when they put you back online (days later), and you get a ton of legit traffic to your website&#8230; BAM shutdown forever. No refund. They steal your source code and wont give it back. You ask them to delete it, they wont.</p>
<p>Nightmarehost = thieves and cheats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaakov Ellis</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-9474</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaakov Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-9474</guid>
		<description>jabbett - after two months, I am quite happy with the performance and stability. As I hoped, MediaTemple has gotten their act together with some of the stability of the overall &quot;grid&quot;, and they seem dedicated to improving it and killing the bugs going forward (and have been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/01/19/anatomy-of-mysql-on-the-grid/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;transparent&lt;/a&gt; about it as well, something that I always find to be a very good sign for a hosting company. Control panel is easy to use, their support has also been responsive to my requests, going &quot;above and beyond&quot; several times. 

They use Urchin for stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jabbett &#8211; after two months, I am quite happy with the performance and stability. As I hoped, MediaTemple has gotten their act together with some of the stability of the overall &#8220;grid&#8221;, and they seem dedicated to improving it and killing the bugs going forward (and have been <a href="http://www.mediatemple.net/weblog/2007/01/19/anatomy-of-mysql-on-the-grid/" rel="nofollow">transparent</a> about it as well, something that I always find to be a very good sign for a hosting company. Control panel is easy to use, their support has also been responsive to my requests, going &#8220;above and beyond&#8221; several times. </p>
<p>They use Urchin for stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jabbett</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-9453</link>
		<dc:creator>jabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-9453</guid>
		<description>Any additional thoughts on MediaTemple performance and stability to share two months later?

Despite the fact I paid for &quot;lifetime&quot; hosting from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.textdrive.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TextDrive&lt;/a&gt;, I&#039;ve grown tired of their spotty performance and unfulfilled promises ... and now my support tickets are going unanswered for days.  Time for someone new, it seems.

(What kind of stats package does (mt) provide?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any additional thoughts on MediaTemple performance and stability to share two months later?</p>
<p>Despite the fact I paid for &#8220;lifetime&#8221; hosting from <a href="http://www.textdrive.com/" rel="nofollow">TextDrive</a>, I&#8217;ve grown tired of their spotty performance and unfulfilled promises &#8230; and now my support tickets are going unanswered for days.  Time for someone new, it seems.</p>
<p>(What kind of stats package does (mt) provide?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellis Web &#187; What is powering GridServer?</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellis Web &#187; What is powering GridServer?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5037</guid>
		<description>[...] MediaTemple vs. DreamHost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MediaTemple vs. DreamHost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaTemple GridServer is buggy at Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5011</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaTemple GridServer is buggy at Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5011</guid>
		<description>[...] Also see Ellis Web - similar experiences. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also see Ellis Web &#8211; similar experiences. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaakov Ellis</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5010</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaakov Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5010</guid>
		<description>@Abhijit:

I have had a good experience so far with Dreamhost. But still have the problems of having your site tied to a specific piece of hardware (and as you can see, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;they do have problems&lt;/a&gt; on a somewhat regular basis with specific pieces of software. Though there is nothing that can really be done about this (it is the nature of hardware to eventually break), assuming that (mt) can pull it off, it puts them at a definite advantage in terms of reliability and uptime.

(That said, it would be nice to see (mt) put up some kind of equivalent to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DreamHost Status&lt;/a&gt; site).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Abhijit:</p>
<p>I have had a good experience so far with Dreamhost. But still have the problems of having your site tied to a specific piece of hardware (and as you can see, <a href="http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/" rel="nofollow">they do have problems</a> on a somewhat regular basis with specific pieces of software. Though there is nothing that can really be done about this (it is the nature of hardware to eventually break), assuming that (mt) can pull it off, it puts them at a definite advantage in terms of reliability and uptime.</p>
<p>(That said, it would be nice to see (mt) put up some kind of equivalent to the <a href="http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/" rel="nofollow">DreamHost Status</a> site).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhijit Shylanath</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5008</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhijit Shylanath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-5008</guid>
		<description>@Yaakov:
I&#039;m a new MT customer as well, but I face the same problem, database deaths...

@Iwo:
...and server deaths.

I&#039;m waiting to see if it&#039;ll get resolved in a couple of months. If it doesn&#039;t, I&#039;m switching to DreamHost, since a lot of people (including Yaakov) seem to have had positive experiences. Then again, that&#039;s what I&#039;d read about MediaTemple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yaakov:<br />
I&#8217;m a new MT customer as well, but I face the same problem, database deaths&#8230;</p>
<p>@Iwo:<br />
&#8230;and server deaths.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting to see if it&#8217;ll get resolved in a couple of months. If it doesn&#8217;t, I&#8217;m switching to DreamHost, since a lot of people (including Yaakov) seem to have had positive experiences. Then again, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;d read about MediaTemple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iwo</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-4406</link>
		<dc:creator>Iwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-4406</guid>
		<description>I am hoping that they will fix this issue.  If not, I am moving to DreamHost.  But, I will give them some time to work on it.  Its only database problems, if you run a website without database, you will not experience the issue.  Also, MT is aware of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping that they will fix this issue.  If not, I am moving to DreamHost.  But, I will give them some time to work on it.  Its only database problems, if you run a website without database, you will not experience the issue.  Also, MT is aware of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koetsier</title>
		<link>http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-4395</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koetsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ellisweb.net/2006/11/mediatemple-vs-dreamhost/#comment-4395</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not totally following you there, Yaakov. I had almost no trouble at all actually moving my sites ... it&#039;s in the operation of them that I&#039;ve had issues.

I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s anything technically different between accounts that are created on GS as opposed to ones moved over from SS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not totally following you there, Yaakov. I had almost no trouble at all actually moving my sites &#8230; it&#8217;s in the operation of them that I&#8217;ve had issues.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s anything technically different between accounts that are created on GS as opposed to ones moved over from SS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

